Those blokes in the UK are so sensible. Sensitive too…at least I think so.
Late in 2009, the Trade Union Congress (mostly made up of men) proposed banning high heels from the workplace. Why? Well, they say it’s for health and safety reasons – they can cause injuries, but also because they’re demeaning to women. Aw, nice. And over in Scotland, Network Rail (bet that’s mainly men too) is encouraging women to ditch the stilettos for … less accident-prone shoes on railway concourses.
But then of course, as with any new suggestion, out come the nitpicking columnists and letter writers who object just because they can…but this time, the opponents are women! Scottish councillor Maxine Smith (an avid high heel wearer) said: “I would not see any good reason to suddenly swap my high heels before arriving at the station. This may well be a case of Network Rail looking for a ‘get out’ clause in the face of customers submitting less than altruistic insurance claims. If so, it is a sad reflection of the compensation culture in the society in which we live.”
And, on the Trade Union Congress story, the Telegraph quotes Nadine Dorries, Tory MP, who apparently says heels are beneficial for women in the workplace:”I’m 5ft 3in and need every inch of my Christian Louboutin heels to look my male colleagues in the eye,” she said. “If high heels were banned in Westminster, no one would be able to find me. The TUC need to get real, [and] stop using overtly sexist tactics by discussing women’s stilettos…”
She’s backed up by Michelle Dewberry, a former winner of TV reality show ‘The Apprentice’: “This is absolutely ridiculous and I think these union officials should be spending their time dealing with more important issues. I’m at work in five-inch heels and perfectly able to do my job. Heels are sexy, they boost your confidence and they are empowering to women. I can’t imagine these officials debating a motion about how tightly men should wear their ties. Wearing heels is a personal choice.”
So…and I’m scratching my head a bit here – it’s women’s personal choice to wear heels that can cause accidents and injuries. Fine. But it’s also their choice to wear heels because if they don’t they’re disadvantaged, disempowered and have less confidence in the workplace? Says who? Women. Strange. Whatever happened to feminism?
Suffice to say, spare a thought for short men. Who’s sticking up for them in the corporate world? Let’s hope they have access to complementary counselling for their – undoubted – self-esteem and inferiority issues.





Instead of copying what other people have said, you may want to comment on what is hot in the news at a particular moment.